Forex Trading

Quasi Contract Meaning, Features & It Types

A person is obliged to compensate another although the basis of this obligation is neither a contract between the parties, nor any tort on the part of the person who is bound to compensate. The basis of the obligation is that no one should have the unjust benefit at the cost of the other. If A gets unjust enrichment at the cost of B, A has an obligation to compensate B for the same. A alone pays the amount to C and B, not knowing this fact, pays 100 rupees over again to C.

Navrana has paid the landlord again, even though Rajkumar has already paid the full amount of the rent. The landlord is liable for restoring the money provided by the renter in this situation. A qualified doctor happens to pass by and saves her neighbor’s life by doing emergency surgery.

Rights of the Finder of Goods

The person for whom the act is done is not bound to pay unless he had the choice to reject the services. It is only where a person voluntarily accepts the thing or enjoys the work done that the liability under Section 70 arises. Further, it is necessary that services should have been rendered without any request. A is not entitled to compensation from B if the circumstances show that he intended to act gratuitously.

features of quasi contract

The person doing the act should not have intended to do it gratuitously. A alone pays the amount to C, and B, not knowing this fact, pays Rs. 100 over again to C. The other person for whom something is done or to whom something is delivered must enjoy the benefit thereof. He should only be interested in making the payment in order to protect his own interest. Thirdly, it is a right which is available not against the entire world, but against a particular person or persons only, so that in this respect it resembles a contractual right.

Law Article in India

When dealing with quasi contract , you may hear the term quantum merit. In this case the judgement was held that case was made by a. Purchaser of an estate from a limited owner during the existence of his interests in order to redeem a subsisting mortgage on the property.

What are the instances of quasi contract?

Examples of Quasi-Contract

A person orders some perishable items online by providing his address and paying for the same. At the time of the delivery of the goods, the delivery man delivers them to the wrong address. Instead of denying the delivery, the receiving party accepts the order and consumes the same.

There are 5 features/types of quasi-contractsprovided under sections 68 to 72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Definition of Quasi-Contract is nowhere provided in the Indian Contract Act, but there are some features of quasi-contract in the Indian Contract Act, defined under sections 68 to 72. C, however, cannot recover the amount from C is no privity of contract between B and C.

Legal Katta

In this case, the person who lost the work and the money could file a civil suit, asking for the payment to be made. In this case, the judge may institute a Quasi-contract, if they think money is owed. Quasi Contract laws have been derived from the Latin statement “Nemo debet locupletari ex aliena jactura” which proclaims that no human being should gain an unjust benefit from another’s loss. In the case of Hari Ram Sheth Khandsari v. Commissioner of Sales Tax , the applicant of this case deposited the tax as a major turnover of Khandsari and it was initially taxable at the rate of 2 percent. Because of a mistake, in the fourth quarter, the applicant deposited the tax at the rate of 4 percent which means a total of Rs. 10,198.22 of excess money was deposited.

Being in the arrears, his land is advertised for sale by the govt. Under the revenue law the consequences of such sale will be annulment of B’s lease. B to prevent the sale and the consequent annulment of his own lease, pays to the government the sum due from A. Quasi contract are the legal obligations created by law. The firm sought to recover back the money as having been paid under either mistake of law or coercion. The Supreme Court held that the firm did not suffer from any mistake under Section 72.

Features of Quasi Contract (Types of Quasi Contract)

Voidable contracts are the type of contracts that are basically an agreement that is enforceable for a party/parties and which is not enforceable by law for the other party/parties. A person who is interested in the payment of money which another is bound to pay, and who therefore pays it, is entitled to be reimbursed by the other. If necessaries are supplied to a person who is incapable of contracting, the supplier is entitled to claim their price from the property of such a person. If it is contingent on the happening of a future event, it is enforceable when the event happens.

This course provides access to all the relevant sections, assignments, examination pointers and the full text of relevant syllabus cases from SCC Online. The assignments will enable you to test your understanding of concepts. The examination pointers will give you a fair idea of questions and topics that are more likely to be asked in the examinations. The course is also linked to chapters from Avtar Singh’s Law of Contract through EBC Reader. This, upon subscription to EBC Reader, provides quick access to relevant chapters from the book. For example, Karthik owns and operates anelectronic shop.

features of quasi contract

The party whose payment is due was in fact bound by the law to repay. The word “Necessaries” has not been defined under this Act. The general meaning of “Necessaries” means, necessaries to sustain life, basic things like food, shelter, clothing and education. These are the things that are necessary to live and without these things, a person could not exist.

All about quasi-contracts and its types

A is not entitled to compensation from B, if the circumstances show that he intended to act gratuitously. The plaintiff should be interested in making the payment. It is not necessary that he should have a legal proprietary interest in the property in respect of which the payment is made. However, often it is used to determine whether plaintiff was interested. Sec. 69 does not invite such judicial limitation that a person who has not an interest in the property can be interested in a payment of that property. A supplies B, a lunatic, with necessaries suitable to his condition in life.

We shall have a look on these cases of ‘Quasi-contracts’. The quasi-contract concept is frequently overlooked, yet it nevertheless holds a significant position because it is founded on the values of justice and impartiality. Even though in Indian contract law, quasi-contracts have a new name, however, the principle’s basic character and substance have not changed significantly. Quantum revenue is a concept used in the context of quasi-contracts. If someone breaks the contract on purpose, the chances of the quasi-contract being used are slim. If the employee intentionally violates the contract, however, this form of penalty is frequently less severe.

  • In the former, the contract is a mere fiction, imposed in order to adapt the case to a given remedy.
  • For example, P agreed to pay Q a sum of money, if a certain ship does not return.
  • In the event of quasi-contracts, the parties’ intent is not taken into account.
  • So, the person helping commits to take up the job and turns down another for the same.

Privatization of presidency Sector Although in today’s time most of the services provided in ou… The plaintiff’s receipt of some type of benefit while breaching an existing contract. The defendant must have accepted those goods or services and receive some type of benefit from them.

Supreme Court Instantly

The party paying the other party’s dues is interested in the payment.The party whose payment is due was bound by law to pay. K paid sales tax on his forward transactions of bullion. Held, K could recover the amount of sales tax and that sec. 72 is wide enough to cover not only mistake of fact but also mistake of law..

  • However, often it is used to determine whether plaintiff was interested.
  • Such kind of obligations is generally described, for the want of better or more appropriate name, as Quasi-Contractual Obligations.
  • He should only be interested in making the payment in order to protect his own interest.
  • You should, however, note that in such circumstances, the price only of necessaries and not of articles of luxury, can be recovered.
  • This is when the court steps in to create a contract and achieve a level of fairness between the parties involved.

Right to Sue– If the owner has published a reward for whoever discovers the item, the finder has the option of suing the owner or keeping the item until he is rewarded. He or she has a responsibility not to use the commodities for personal gain. The finder has a responsibility to exercise reasonable caution. And the retention of unjust of the enrichment is unjust. In one case it appears to be a fiction and in the other appears to be a fact that is legitimately inferred.

Sections 68 to 72 deals with certain relations resembling those created by contract. This unjust receipt may become a result of chance or misfortune for someone else . To be enriched unjustly, someone has to receive a benefit, but not paid for or worked to get that benefit . Therefore, it is considered ethically sotp valuation and morally appropriate to return it. The plaintiff should have sustained loss or damage of some kind when the defendant received unjust enrichment. Whereas Quasi-contract definition is based more on the principles of natural law such as moral conscience, justice, honesty, duty towards another human being etc.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published.